24
Sep

Let's Get Political – Wordless Wednesday

by Tiffany in Political Action

Well, I guess there are some words in the picture. ;)

I am voting for Obama!

Photo credit: Scandblue

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008

91 Comments

  • Angela

    Obama wants to make gay marriages legal in all states; he wants to make homeschooling illegal; and his voting record shows, he’s not a man to be trusted. Ron Paul was my man, but since he’s out I’ll be voting for Chuck Baldwin.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    I approve of making gay marriage legal, he does not want to make homeschooling illegal (this is kind of a bizarre statement), and I am a-okay with his voting record.

  • Angela

    He supports abortions, even late term abortions. God doesn’t believe in gay marriage. CA has made homeschooling illegal. It was overturned, but has since been made illegal again. He supports that.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Angela,

    Homeschool is a state issue…the Federal government has no control over that regardless of what Obama feels about California. He can’t dictate state policy.

    Clearly you are making your political decisions based upon a Biblical world view…I will not be.

  • http://mostlynaturalmomma.com Momma

    I respect your decision, but let me tell you why I am NOT an Obama Mama. My husband works for a small business owner who employs only six people. With Obama’s tax plan and the way most small business owners file their taxes, the small business owner would end up paying more taxes. Therefore, my husband’s job is in jeopardy because the owner will not be able to pay the taxes and everybody on his payroll.

    And the abortion thing really gets to me. I don’t know where I stand on first trimester abortions. That I can see both sides of. But I do not support 2nd trimester abortions and I definitely don’t support 3rd trimester abortions. By the time you hit the 2nd and 3rd you should know whether or not you want an abortion. And babies survive abortions all the time. I can not support somebody that supports that.

    May I ask why you like him?

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Momma,

    Obama’s tax plan will decrease taxes for 95% of Americans.

    I support Obama because:

    He is the green candidate. He supports alternative energy and actually wants to reduce our dependence on oil. His opponents have a disgusting ecological protection record.

    He is for regulation of greedy corporations that harm our families. McCain’s deregulation stance is exactly why our financial situation is so dire in this country.

    He supports healthcare initiatives that would provide affordable healthcare to anyone that wants it.

    He voted against this war and wants to leave Iraq and start using diplomacy in foreign matters instead thinking we have to be the police of the world. I think our country is far safer with a smart, level headed man in the white house…not a hot head.

    He is for ethical reform and transparency in Washington and his opponents are deeply entrenched with corruption.

    I believe that his diverse background is wonderful too. We have so many different people in this country and since they are all citizens shouldn’t government also work for them??? Say if they are gay and want to get married? We cannot tolerate legal discrimination or any party that endorses it.

    With the war, the lies that motivated the war, the Bush doctrine, rendition, and torture being accepted as policy I think we need to get some people with better judgment in the white house.

    As for the abortion issue. I am pro-life. But I do not believe as conservatives do that the right to life begins at conception and ends at birth…as evidenced by their support of bloody wars and the death penalty.

  • http://www.hudsonsmom.blogspot.com Elisabeth

    Well said.

    This Obama Mama agrees.

  • http://mostlynaturalmomma.com Momma

    thanks for the response!

    His tax plan may decrease taxes for some Americans, but with his tax plan my husband’s job is still at risk.Unfortunately, as I’m sure you understand, being a stay at home mom the thought of my husband losing his job is very scary. It makes it hard to look closely at the other issues.

    Thanks for all your other thoughts. I am going to have to go back to both their websites and keep reading! I think that is probably all I will be doing until election day! lol

  • http://mostlynaturalmomma.com Momma

    that last comment made it sound like I don’t look at other issues. haha. because I do. Some just tend to be more important than other.

  • Molomatic

    Tiffany, you have expressed my thoughts on Obama as well!

    He is definitely getting this Obama Mama’s vote!

  • momof3

    Thank you Tiffany – I will need to share your post other mamas !!!

  • Doris

    No candidate is perfect nor will you agree with all stances for any of the candidates. The key is to pick the majority of issues you agree with and hope for the best, as sad as that is.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Michelle,

    Obama is a casual associate of Ayers. They sat on a school related board together and no matter how hard the media tries they cannot show they were even friends. If I sat on the PTA with a former hippie bomber (who was never convicted) does that make me a terrorist? No. But regardless Ayers may be a very different man now. Who are we to judge?

    Drilling is not green at all. Drilling was banned because of terrible oils spills in California. Instead of taking the stance that oil will fix our money situation we need a Prez who wants to use alternative energy and eventually break the oil strangehold with solar, wind, geothermal, bio fuels, etc.

    McCain and Palin are in big oil’s pocket. Palin think global warming is not man made, she legalized ghastly aerial hunting, she wants polar bears to be killed when they get in the way of oil drilling, etc.

    Also I don’t think I have ever run across a candidate I dislike more than Palin…don’t get me started on her. ;)

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    This is true Doris,

    McCain’s views on abortion are closer to mine than Obama and his views on education are just like mine. Niether issue is big enough to sway me away from Obama though, whose vlaues are more like mine.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    I think Palin’s abstinance only sex ed views are flawed and dangerous. I don’t think creationism should be taught in schools and in fact I am for less Christinity in the government…since that only represents a portion of our diverse country.

    I disagree with her lack of envrionmental policy…the oil drilling, the hunting, taking polar bears off the endangered species list, raping the Bristol salmon run with a copper mine, etc.

    She has also abused her power…firing a good man who wouldn’t fire her ex brother in law and then saying it was because he went on an unathorized trip when she herself signed off on the trip…so she is liar too. She also fired a librarian for not banning books that she felt were not Christian and only re-hired her after the public went nuts. She fired many of the staffers in her city and replaced them with her unqualified high school friends. Her best friend was given oversight over agriculture and a 90,000 a year paycheck and her only qualification was that she liked cows.

    She sank her town into over 20 million dollars in debt and they had no debt previously. I think she is grossly unqualified to be Governor let alone VP or Prez.

  • Elisabeth

    I love Palin…and will vote for McCain because of his VP pick. Obama does not offer much for conservatives and it would be a grave wrong (aka totally against my faith) to vote for him. With over 4,000 abortions happening every day in the US, yes, I am a single issue voter. That trumps the war, sorry.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    So the right to life does begin at conception and end at birth? Why would the life of a child or adult in Iraq matter less than the unborn? I am confused on that one.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Oh and neither candidate will make abortion illegal.

  • http://thewanderingteacher-patricia.blogspot.com/ Patricia

    Hi Tiffany,
    My 2 cents is : There are many many more people killed before birth in the US than there are people die in Iraq.
    But apart from that, for every abortion that is performed there is a woman who is at risk of emotional pain. There is a higher incidence of suicide, drug and alcohol abuse in women who have had abortions, than in the general population.
    I’m with Angela, Chuck’s my man, although I really like Sarah. But hey ho, I’m British so can’t vote anyway. lol.

  • http://mostlynaturalmomma.com Momma

    Michelle you summed up what I have trouble saying! lol

  • Julie A.

    I love it!! I wish I was a mama so I can say that I am an Obama Mama, but hopefully soon. I read all your insights on this post and I agree with you Tiffany. Way to stay strong and to stand up for what you believe in.

  • http://www.greenandcleanmom.org Sommer

    Great conservation. I’m digging through all of this now. The facts. The reports. The opinions. What is true? What isn’t? Who to believe or not believe? We are all passionate mamas, regardless of our votes. I believe my vote counts. I believe that my decision makes a difference. I don’t want to say, Obama I love you. Mcain, I’m your gal…you have my vote.

    Not because I don’t want to take a stance but I’m being calculated. I’m reading. I’m watching. I’m not getting into the blogher ads, signage, buttons, rallies, etc. They’re to excite people and make them forget issues. If I get onboard with one team, would I jump ship? No. Politics market and you putting this up helps market. Helps other moms make choices. Did they pay you, no. Regardless it is word of mouth markeing and I’m happy you can take that stance. I’m not there yet.

    I read what you write Tiffany and wonder about where you get your facts? I wonder where the other side gets theres? The media with skewed information, biased sources, big bucks attached? The Obama site? I’m eager to learn more in the months to come and try to filter out the media and the BS.

  • http://www.ForYourBugABoo.com Cheri D

    What a great conversation you started Tiffany! I have to add in my 2 cents too! While I think it is great to feel passionate about a particular issue like abortion…I hope that voters will remember that if we don’t take care of our Mother Earth first, we will not be around much longer to debate all of the other issues! I think a lot about the future of my 3 year old son and the rest of our children, our Earth is in trouble and we need a President that is ready to take charge and do something about Global Warming!
    I am proud to be An Obama Mama!!

  • Caitlin

    Tiffany, Cheri D., I’m with you. All these topics are hot ones. The abortion one is hard for me. I have my personal feelings about what I would or would not do with an unwanted pregnancy, but for someone else to tell ME what I can or cannot do with my body is insane. My mother fought that battle 35 years ago; let’s move on. It makes more sense to me if we discuss ways to decrease the incidence of unwanted pregnancies. There’s a debate worth having.

  • Abe

    Oy, did you expect such diverse response? I’m new to your blog and enjoy it so I don’t know your readers yet or you that well :) Anyway, I’m also an Obama Momma!

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Great responses! I did not expect so much diversity on this issue frankly because this a predominantly “green” blog and Obama is the green candidate but I wouldn’t encourage anyone to be a one issue voter. Its drives me a little nuts when people vote for a candidate based only on abortion so I wouldn’t want to encourage anyone to vote only on green issues. Although green issues impact the whole planet, abortion is a personal choice that need never affect us.

    Sommer,
    Most of what I said about Obama and Palin are public record. The only times I speculated were about the people Palin fired…she has deliberately not cooperated with investigations into these so what does that tell you? It tells me she is guilty as heck.

    I use Huffington Post and the Daily Kos as some main resources but then I fact check through places like factcheck.org. Don’t believe campaigns ads at all….they are all misleading. I also participate in a political debate forum so it is really important for me to be sure about things…as I would get trounced by the others if I were wrong. I don’t like having my a** handed to me. LOL.

  • http://nohe5.typepad.com Laundry and Children

    I am McCainiac. I am pro-life and this is a big issue for me, but not the only one. Since someone brought up the war in Iraq with this issue, all I can say is that we have an all volunteer army. The difference between the unborn and those in the military is that the men and women in the military chose to join and serve their county, the unborn children have no voice as to what happens to them. We shouldn’t use the military as canon fodder, but it’s the military, not a social club. Their job is fight for our nation and for that we are indebted to them forever.

    Also, my husband’s family owns a small business. I understand that it is tempting to say think that people who own businesses are obviously the rich and they should have to pay more because they make more. First, most small business owners are not rich, far from it. Secondly, I just don’t understand the thought process that says that in order to grow the economy we should take money from those people who can use it to actually create jobs. Give the average American a thousand dollars and they will go spend it. Give a rich business owner a tax break and he can use the money to create jobs.

    Finally, I want someone willing to think outside of the box. McCain was thinking way outside of the box when he picked Sarah Palin. Obama went with the safe choice of Joe Biden. Now that we need our elected officials to work for us in Washington, McCain is putting his country’s needs above his own and has suspended his campaign. For Obama it is politics as usual. There are times when you have to put your own self interests second.

    That is why I will be voting for McCain.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Laundry and Children,

    I am not even talking about our military dying. I am talking about he innocent Iraqi people. Is is okay to condone death for those outside American political protection?

    As for the tax and spend theory…the last 3 Republican presidents we had all sank our budget into a deficit…by hundreds of millions. The lone tax and spend liberal (Clinton) gave us a 200 million dollar surplus and a better economy than we had since the great depression. History tells us that tax and spend works.

    I don’t believe McCain thought outside the box with Palin…she only met her once before he picked her and she wasn’t even vetted. It was a stunt meant to appeal to women and deeply religious people….it worked pretty well.

    Obama picked someone he liked and respected and wanted to work with and this is a bad thing?

    You pretty well illustrated why I feel as I do. McCain is trying to “trick” us into voting for him so we ignore that he voted along with Bush 95% of the time. McCain is a Bush clone and we can’t afford 8 more years of the same ole same ole. His doing a 180 and turning into a “Maverick” just before the election should not erase his past record.

  • shulie

    Yay, Tiffany and all the other Obama Mamas out there! I am one too. For the poster who said she felt more secure under McCain/Palin, I have to ask why? The Republican government over the last 8 years has completely misled the public about Al Qaida and Iraq. Please remember that Iraq had NOTHING to do with Al Qaida and the 9/11 bombings! Even Pres. Bush has since conceded that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and that the war in Iraq has only allowed Al Qaida to put down roots there during all the chaos. Why continue to trust Republicans when they have lied to the American people at such a great cost?

    As for Palin, I’m curious what people find so “impressive” about her. I listened to her two measly interviews with Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric, and she just talked in circles and was vague and evasive. If the McCain campaign has such confidence in her, let her do a real press conference and field questions.

  • Amanda

    Ladies beware – Sarah Palin wants to steal your womb and replace it with a rifle. She doesn’t represent women’s interests, she represents conservative war mongers, self-righteous people who think they should dictate everyone elses life and hypocrites. She lives in her own world – not the real world. She wants to cut sexual education and replace it with abstinence programs. This does not work as her 17 daughter is knocked up. Also, on the sensitive issue of abortion consider this: you are a mother of 3 young boys, you are in a hospital dying and unfortunately, the only way to save your life would be to abort the fetus you are carrying- even if it is only a few days old. If McCain and Palin have their way- you would die. Leaving your children without a mother and your husband without a wife. Can we all remember there is a separation of Church and state. That’s why this country was founded. You may disagree with someone else’s choices, but you cannot control them. Worry about yourself and what you are doing to create positive energy in this world!

  • Michelle

    Amanda,
    As Tiffany already stated NEITHER candidate will make abortion illegal. Your comment about the mother with 3 young children in the hospital is really uncalled for and is ridiculous! You as well as the readers of this blog know that would never happen!

    Please go back and do research…this country was not founded on the seperation of church and state…it was founded with Christian principles. We did not just recently put In God We Trust on our money (as just one example).

    Abstinence programs do work better than handing out contraceptives to high school kids. Sex Education can still be done but to liberals sex education is just handing out condoms! I have much more respect for Sarah Palin in the fact that they are dealing with things that many american families deal with…teen pregnancy. Also with her son Trig…she doesn’t just talk the talk, she walks the walk. 90% of down syndrome babies are aborted!

    Your post does not creat positive energy at all! What kind of country would we live in if we all only thought of ourselves. We are already kind of there and I would like to see it go the other way.

  • http://blog.thenatureschild.com Cate

    Thank you so much for your articulate responses on Obama’s policies in this comment section, Tiffany.

    Don’t forget your “Moms Vote” sticker. It’ll look fabulous next to your Obama sticker.

    http://blog.thenatureschild.com/2008/09/snag-this-sticker-moms-vote.html

  • http://mostlynaturalmomma.com Momma

    Hi Sommer! Your thoughts mirror mine exactly. It’s funny when someone else can put your thoughts into words better than you can. lol. It’s so hard to form an educated opinion during this election. The media is so far gone with what they are printing it is VERY hard to find hard facts. I am still leaning toward McCain/Palin, but I will definitely take into account what everyone here has said and keep doing my own reading.

    Hi Amanda! You seem very bitter towards those who believe differently than you do. Take Palin for instance, I don’t agree with her on everything, but it is refreshing to hear somebody say exactly what they believe and tell us exactly what they want to accomplish, not skirt around the issues. And I think your abortion example is a little off also. I don’t believe in abortion, but I would never tell anybody they can’t do something they want to do. The situation you described would be a hard one and there are a lot of conservatives out there who would sympathize with that mother. And now look at Obama, agree with him on some issues and disagree with him on others, but is he really ready do run the country? Big fat NO. He hasn’t really even done anything in the senate except run for president. I might be ready to vote for him in a few years when he has shown me that he can accomplish things. McCain has proven that. Even though I don’t agree with him on everything he will have a productive White House. As a conservative it is hard to read comments like yours. You want me to be ok with your beliefs, but you can trample on mine?

    And Tiffany, thanks for the discussion! Your comments have been very helpful.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    I encourage everyone to watch Obama’s speeches. He is VERY clear about what he wants to do from A-Z. If you hear from others or media that he hasn’t said where he stands…I am sorry but they are misinformed or lying.

    Also McCain is just a Senator too…just like Obama. If you are looking for executive experience McCain does not have any either. Palin has more than both with her 18 months as Governor.

  • Michelle

    For whatever reason my last response didn’t come through. Maybe that was a good thing…I was responding to Amanda’s riduculous post and may not have been nice about it. :)

    I agree with you Momma, on your response to Amanda…and I think you said it better than I did! :)

    I agree that Obama has been very clear with what he wants to do but I also think it can’t be done without really taxing the daylights out of everyone. I just don’t believe him. But then again it’s hard to believe any politician. I do think that the true colors came out when McCain suspended his campaign to deal with this big economic mess we are in. It seems that when he says Country First, he means it.

    Being a stay at home mom I don’t want my taxes raised…it is hard enough to make ends meet as it is. Unfortunately tax and spend doesn’t work. And Bush has been trying to pull out of the mess that Clinton left us for the last 8 years which has obviously been hard since our country is not so great off right now.

    Just another of my 2 cents. (I suppose I am way above a $1 by now!) :)

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Michelle,

    I will admit that “maybe” he will tax the daylights out of everyone but he has stated that he hopes to be able to readjust and cut things to get the money. We are spending more in Iraq every year than it would cost to give every American healthcare. He wants to cut the pork and send that money elsewhere without taxing us.

    But frankly I would be willing to have my taxes go up to ensure that me and my children have access to healthcare if we need it and that they have a clean earth to live on.

  • Amanda

    Didn’t mean to get everyone in a tizzy! First of all, John McCain, when asked point blank if he would reverse Roe v. Wade said YES!!! I saw it with my own eyes and heard it! Each candidate has good points and bad points- of course they are out for their own agenda. Ideally, we should have several candidates to choose from, not just two. I am so passionate about politics because we call this a “free” country and it is not. I don’t mean to be bitter, I just want my children to grow up feeling that they can be who they want to be. I’m not “trampling” anyone’s beliefs. I am not trying to say that you should believe what I beleive! That’s the whole point of a free country! And by the way, I am NOT a Christian, although I respect Christianity and follow the golden rule, so I cannot support the “Christian” principles that the country was founded on. Sometimes we need to make harsh statements to open other’s eyes. But I respect everyone’s differences, but don’t force me follow them if I disagree and I don’t expect you to follow mine vice versa. Love and light to all- we all need it no matter what we believe.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    I think Amanda is just anxious about having someone who is anti-choice in the VP slot…as am I. I really prefer not to give someone governmental power who feels they have a right or duty to tell me what to do with my body, what books I should read, that I should send my sons to war to be part of “God’s Plan”, or that religious theory should be taught to my kids as fact. It is very alarming to many us who do not favor governmental control.

    What scares me most is that McCain/Palin want to keep us at war with Iraq and possibly declare war on Russia too…that could very well mean a draft…as a mom I NEVER want to have to face a draft for my sons.

  • casual friday everyday

    I just hope whoever gets into office can clean up the mess we’re in. The messes I should say. :(

  • casual friday everyday

    If you go to cafepress.com, Mandy, I bet you could find one.

  • Deborah

    Wow! Wordless Wednesday turned up a wordy conversation all based on a photo (albeit, with words) ;-) Good discussion. As the years progress we have more and more topics relevant to our society and we need to decide where we stand on them. 100 years ago we didn’t have abortion or gay marriage, so the choices for candidates may have been more simple – either democrat or republican. It is not so simple today and unless you make a decision based on one issue you will rarely agree 100% with a candidate’s platform or their running mate. Unfortunately it has come to the lesser of the 2 evils. I wish Ron Paul was in there!

  • Deborah

    isn’t it thursday?

  • http://www.sustainablepeachtreecorners.com Robin

    Amen sister! I’m right there with you Tiffany! I think we are sisters somehow in beliefs and in looks. If I sent you a pic of myself–it’s scary how much you and I look alike!

  • Mandy

    Where can I find an ‘Obama mama” sticker?

  • Amanda

    Thank you Tiffany for articulating my feelings as I could not.

  • http://mostlynaturalmomma.com Momma

    hi Amanda! Thanks for your response and clearing up your thoughts! I think we are all guilty of going off on a bitter rant…I know I am! :o) I think the common misconception is that conservatives are going to try to force people into things. Most conservatives I know will voice their opinion, but never say that a woman must doing this or that. I have my reasons for believing as I do and so does everybody else.

    As to the energy statements made earlier, McCain DOES support alternative energies, not just drilling. I think he just sees what benefit drilling can do for our country. Here is a good post on both Obama’s and McCain’s energy plans:

    http://pos51.org/lexington-and-new-energy/#more-535

    Anyways, this has been a great discussion! Lots to think about!

  • http://livingyellow.blogspot.com Amberlynn

    Sommer, some of my favorite strictly non-partisan fact finding sights are: Congress.org, where you can sign up for a newsletter that tells you how your representatives voted on current issues, what issues are coming up, and makes emailing your reps regarding your opinion VERY easy. Another is votesmart.org, where you can look up candidates voting records based on issues.

    It makes it so easy to skip all the spin and lies when you can find the actual sources in these non-partisan pages.

    And for the record, I believe the right to life should last THROUGH life, not just including war and death penalty, but also the right to a healthy life… health care for that mother and baby, etc.

  • http://blog.thenatureschild.com Cate

    I was raised a pro-life feminist (no, that’s not an oxymoron, as many of you know). My mom taught my sisters and I that our bodies were made to give birth (naturally), and in some ways women have been “duped” to believe there was something wrong with that, or that it was a hindrance in our other pursuits.

    However, when I was pregnant with my first son, I had to leave my fiancee and plan to be a single mom. I went through a lot of very hard times, including abuse, but I got out. And I realized this: I had a support system that most women did not have. I had an awesome midwife who set me up with a fantastic therapist, I had a single mama friend who I moved in with and we raised our children together for the first year. And I had (have) five sisters and a wonderful mother to lean on.
    But most women do not have that support system, especially women who have to leave a bad situation in early pregnancy. And I could not fault the choices other people have to make to “survive.”
    Since then I have been pro-choice. Ironic that my pregnancy and amazing labor and delivery changed my belief on this.

    I definitely agree with Tiffany. NEITHER CANDIDATE WILL OVERTURN ROE.
    Do you want to know why? Republicans (and some Democrats) need this and gay marriage to win elections. Because their policies are certainly not in the financial interest of poor voters, especially working single mothers or working mothers in general. But they use these issues to play on conservative voters fears so they will overlook the financial issues.
    Single issue voters simply don’t make sense to me.
    And as we all know, you never know what other people have gone through. I agree with Obama’s statement, “Abortion is not a decision women take lightly.” Give women some credit. It is a hard decision for the vast majority of women, including some close to me. Those who have had to make this decision do not take it lightly. I wish those who are pro-life would consider that.

    You may not want abortions to happen, but if that were really true, you would work day and night for social justice.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Awesome comment Cate…my fave so far. I agree with you totally. Abortion will never be outlawed because they need it as currency. This is why I think it the biggest mistake you can make is to choose a candidate based even the teeniest bit on abortion…it is being used as a diversion, to appeal to your sense of justice, meanwhile you ignore what the candidate is really about. It is nothing more than a ploy.

  • Michelle

    Cate and Tiffany,
    Those of us who are pro-life do take into consideration the position a woman is in when she makes the decision to terminate her pregnancy. I do not judge women when they make the decision to not go through with the pregnancy. I know that it is a heart wrenching decision that is not made lightly. I too have some friends who chose this route and have since regretted it deeply for years. Being mean and saying to any woman how could you have done that does nothing to help them heal.

    I’m not sure if anyone knows or not but Roe in Roe v Wade did not have an abortion and is now a pro life advocate.

    I do take offense Tiffany when you say: “This is why I think it the biggest mistake you can make is to choose a candidate based even the teeniest bit on abortion…it is being used as a diversion, to appeal to your sense of justice, meanwhile you ignore what the candidate is really about. It is nothing more than a ploy.”
    That may be the first issue I look at but it goes into who I believe the candidate to be and what he stands for whether or not he can overturn Roe v. Wade, which I know is not going to happen. This president is important in the fact that he will be choosing 3 supreme court justices during his time in office. I do believe McCain to be the better of the 2 to make that decision. But I do look at the prolife person in an election. I do not think that is a small issue at all.

    Cate, your are exactly right when you say that we (pro-lifers)need to be working tirelessly to end abortion!

    Tiffany, just a quick note on comments you made about Sarah Palin.
    “She did not demand that books be banned from the Wasilla library. Some of the books on a widely circulated list were not even in print at the time. The librarian has said Palin asked a “What if?” question, but the librarian continued in her job through most of Palin’s first term.” (This was taken from factcheck.org)
    And another item from factcheck. org: “Palin has not pushed for teaching creationism in Alaska’s schools. She has said that students should be allowed to “debate both sides” of the evolution question, but she also said creationism “doesn’t have to be part of the curriculum.” ”
    I don’t know about putting Wasilla into debt but I do know that she got the state OUT of debt. Also I did hear her say in an interview that she put the Alaskan government’s checkbook online so the people could see how the state’s money was being spent. She said that is what she would like to do with Washington’s checkbook. I don’t know if that could be done but I would love that! If we could see where our money was going I think that would hold people a little bit more accountable in Washington!

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Michelle,

    Sorry to offend but my proof is in the pudding. We just had a Republican President who played the same abortion card both times he was up for election. He did NOTHING to ban abortion or even make it easier to do so. I don’t think they ever will either…it is the leverage they hold over the head of their constituents. They know it is a hot button that they push and people dance for them. McCain is constantly bashed by his own side for being not very conservative. I seriously doubt he will appoint anti-abortion court justices.

    About the books…yes that is what factcheck says but they are leaving out an important part….Palin did FIRE the librarian after their encounter and only when the town protested did she re-hire her. We have no proof she fired her for not being willing to ban books but I think it is pretty easy to see what happened IMO. If it wasn’t over books then why? Palin refused to share her reasons.

    Evolution is science…creation is religion…it has no business being taught in a school that is suposed to honor a separation of church versus state. It is alarming that she would even consider such a thing.

    Also as far as the checkbook online goes. Funny you mention that because this was Obama’s idea and in fact he passed legislation awhile back that started this process. Palin is being a copy cat of Obama there. Palin didn’t get her state out of debt….they had a windfall when gas prices rose. We all pay more at the pump and she skims money off the top to disperse to her state.

  • http://blog.thenatureschild.com Cate

    Michelle,
    I didn’t say pro-lifers should work to end abortion. I said you should work for social justice. …Quite different, there. And I’m not sure you know what that means, if you so easily confused it.
    You are frankly hypocritical if you believe in “life” but do nothing to help the poor who cannot afford to feed another mouth or who have to decide whether to raise a child in an unhealthy or unsafe relationship/environment. You are hypocritical if you are a “pro-life” politician but cut funding to food stamps and welfare programs. Take care of the life that you have pushed women into bringing into the world.
    As I said, I was raised a pro-life feminist, so yes I do know that Roe is pro-life herself. We give women a choice in our culture to believe in life, or adoption, or abortion when necessary, or even “I wouldn’t do it but I wouldn’t take away that choice from others” like most common-sense women I know.
    But we should not take away the ability to make these choices.
    I also know that when Palin was confronted with her daughter’s pregnancy, she said that Bristol had made the choice to have the child. I’m sure as a pro-life mother, she was very proud of that. But you know what else? She had a choice!
    She also has a financially viable family and a support system. Most teens in America in the same situation DO NOT. While I don’t believe we should simply push “abortions for all!” (No progressive does, despite what the conservative pundits like to portray), I do believe this should be one of the many choices available. Even with counseling prior to the abortion, as well as after, if necessary.
    As I pointed out to my mom when she said the same thing (“women feel guilty afterward”), don’t you think it might be the stigma our culture places on abortion? That we frown upon it, so women cannot be “out” about it, and are shamed by religious zealots? Not all women necessarily have to “heal” afterward, but they should not be shunned the way they currently are.
    Also, it sounds many ladies here are buying in to the right-wing propaganda that “Liberals want to hand out condoms.” That is also simply not true. We believe that adolescents–teens– should learn ALL parts of their sexuality. Teach them how to use a condom, yes, and the implications of not. Teach them to respect themselves enough to choose not to have premarital sex, but if they do choose to become sexually active, prepare them, preferably at home before the school. 1) Respect their own bodies. 2) Respect their partner. 3) Following those two: use protection.
    I think that “liberals” are simply progressive enough to realize that kids are simply young adults who make mistakes or make choices we may not want them to. And because they will, we should arm them with all the information possible to keep them healthy, emotionally and physically.
    If you don’t want your children taught sex ed as a comprehensive health class (whether you choose to ignore it or not, sexuality is part of the human biology), or if you do want creationism to be taught to your brood, I think home school would be the best bet for your family.

  • http://mostlynaturalmomma.com Momma

    Cate, I have to say that after you first line about Michelle being “easily confused” I didn’t even want to read the rest of your comment. If you had read any of her comments you would know that she is a smart woman who does her research, she probably just slipped up as many of us tend to do. I am not for belittling people because they have a different belief on something.However I did read the rest of it because I figured I should give you a fair chance. You did make a good point about teens and sex. Most parents these days tend to not talk to their children about sex and leave it up to the public schools or somebody else. It’s important to teach abstinence and the importance of it and it is also important to teach about safe sex.

    This next comment is for Tiffany and Cate. I think it is a little silly to say the creationism can’t be taught in schools. If we want to give our kids a well rounded education, we can’t just teach them about evolution. There are so many other THEORIES out there that the kids should know about. Yes, the theory of evolution should be taught. But creationism should be to. Creationism is not just about religion and it can be taught in a way that shows the history of creationism and the scientific proof that some events in the Bible have been proven to be true. If all we teach them is evolution how is that teaching them to be good critical thinkers? Shouldn’t we tell them everything out there and then let them debate which one sounds more realistic? There is a way to do it without bringing religion into it. I don’t personally believe everything about evolution, but I think it is important to teach kids that the theory is out there and why it is out there. Same with creationism or any other theory out there. Most of the people that I talk to that don’t want creationism in the schools mainly seem to be afraid of it and don’t seem to have a logical reason for not teaching it.

  • http://pos51.org Charles

    Tiffany,

    I’ve enjoyed reading your blog over the last year or so with my wife because you’re always so original and free thinking. But it seems like you’ve given that up for the Obama cause. You’re recycling the same lines his campaign puts out with no critical thought. Some examples:

    McCain voted with Bush over 90%: I don’t know where they got the numbers, but I’ll accept it as true. Obama voted on the D party line just a touch over 97% in 2007.

    Obama’s tax plan can’t lower taxes for 95% of Americans, because about 40% of wage earners don’t pay taxes. Ind, the people he’s going to raise taxes on already pay 40% of total tax revenue, while taking home 21% of total income.

    And you ignored the point of Momma’s post: lower taxes for the employee don’t help if the job disappears because of higher taxes on the employer. But at least they’ll have insurance.

    “He is for ethical reform and transparency in Washington and his opponents are deeply entrenched with corruption.” – McCain’s had his run in with corruption, but entrenched is the wrong word. B.O. has his own issues with that (Raines and Johnson).

    And McCain has worked plenty for reform, particularly in campaign finance – one that Obama avoided by going back on his pledge to use public money. Sure, the RNC has a bunch, but is that a good enough reason to break a pledge?

    In other news…

    Clinton wasn’t exactly “tax and spend”. His New Dems were actually pretty conservative. Think NAFTA and welfare reform. He did do good things for the economy though. Of course, I wonder what would have happened if he didn’t have the Y2K industry (which disappeared as he left, leaving some people out of work). The dot-com bubble gave him some juice, too. What if it had burst in the middle of his term, as the housing bubble did for Bush, instead of being the first economic event for his successor?

    Drilling may not be green, but hope and good intentions don’t provide transportation. the also don’t make good motor lubricant, rubber, plastics, or any of the other things that account for 50% of our oil consumption – apart from transportation. McCain wants to use oil as a “bridge” from where we are to where we’re going with alternative energy. We’re going to be a predominately oil fueled society long after the next president leaves office…we can either be producers or consumers. I vote for production.

    You’ve gone way over the top on Palin. She didn’t say the war was “God’s plan”, she was praying that what we are doing is in line with God’s plan, totally different meanings. She didn’t ban any books.

    One more thing about what you said re:McCain “doing a 180″ and becoming a Maverick right before the election, he actually did the exact opposite. He started lining up on major red-state issues, including become totally silent on embryonic stem cell research, which he supports.

    My last thought (finally, I know) is about evolution and creationism. Evolution is scientific theory. It is the most accepted, but it is not proven. It should be taught with this in mind.

  • http://pos51.org Charles

    Oh, and please find some new news sources. HuffPo and Kos should be considered a waste of time, even for liberals. I don’t think you can claim to be serious about making a reasonable, informed choice if that’s where you get your info. It’s not even an attempt. It’s like claiming the same thing while getting all of your info from Michael Savage and Townhall.com.

    You should start reading at RealClearPolitics.com. That way you’ll get to read Cynthia Tucker and Hugh Hewitt. Look at Drudge once in a while, at least.

    There’s nothing really wrong with being a liberal. You should be comfortable saying,”I support Obama because he’s liberal.” Give it a shot. It might make you smile. There would certainly be less typing.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Charles,

    I guess from your posts you equate liberal opinions with not being a free thinker. If that is your overall opnion you will never come around for Obama or any other liberal candidate regardless of little things called facts. I am a liberal and darn proud of it. I disagree heartily with many of the core issues that conseravtives support and likely always will.

    Now some things I agree with McCain on…like education but overall he is for the failed policies of Bush and his 90% voting record is very significant becuase he wants us to believe that he is a Maverick and that he is not like Bush…his voting record indicates otherwise. 70% of Americans don’t want another Bush.

    I am aware that Obama voted on the D party over 97%. This does not bother me in the least since I believe at the core that the “left” is right.

    To say that Obama can’t cut taxes strains creduilty as that is also what McCain says he will do. Where they differ though is on offerring huge tax cuts via loopholes to the rich and to businesses. The individual has to pay their taxes but Republicans don’t like to hold businesses to the same standard. We end up having to pay their share with tax increases.

    McCain has some 80 lobbyists working for his campaign….those are the people he will be looking out for…not us. That is “entrenched” in corruption.

    As for being producers of oil, Obama has not declared to stop using oil the moment he lands in office but people seem to forget this. What person in their right mind would just rip a rug out from under us like that? It is the lunacy to think Obama would do that. All I can know for sure about McCain is that he voted against alternative energy production and incentives 23 times over the last 26 years. That doesn’t tell me he is for alternative energy in the least…it tells me he has oil compnay men in his pocket pulling his strings.

    What I said about Palin is factual…save an opinion on her banning books. I acknowledge she did not ban books…she set up the groundwork to ban books and fired someone who would clearly oppose her…if making up some other story about what happened lets you sleep at night, fine. Free thinking people can come to their own conclusions. And she did say the war was God’s plan. It is on video. Her explanation after the fact is what you are parroting now. Who is it that belives media soundbytes now? LOL.

    Evolution is scientific theory but it is scientific nonetheless. Creationism is religion…creation by God…purely and totally religion and it must be kept out of our schools IMO. If I teach my kids reincarnation should I lobby to have that added to school science classes or should I just teach them at home?

    HuffPo and Kos are starting points for information. After reading anything there I research it. I also read about the other side of the debate on right leaning sides.

    To imply that someone is not free thinking because they disagree with you is flawed at best and frankly way off base here Charles. I don’t let anyone do my thinking for me.

  • http://pos51.org Charles J.

    I wasn’t saying you aren’t free thinking because you’re liberal or because you disagree with me. I said it because some of the things you’ve repeated from others lack critical thought.

    I’ll go backwards through your response:

    If you’re reading both sides, that’s good. I still think Kos is crazy.

    I didn’t suggest creationism should be taught. I just said that evolution should be taught as an unproven theory. As far as the evolution=science/creation=religion idea, I can see where you’re coming from. But philosophically pure naturalism/physicalism is a religion as well. We all have to choose whether we believe there is something more or if the physical is all that exists. The religious component of evolution is this: the idea that it will one day come together; that it is true, even while unproven, because there just can’t be a god. That’s religion. You’ll disagree, and I understand.

    I’ve seen the widely circulated version of the Palin video, and it picks her up midsentence, changing the meaning of her statement. Here it is entirely, quoted from about 6 minutes into this video (the bold type is what was omitted in the most widely circulated video, and in the Gibson interview):

    Pray for our military. He [Track] is going to be deployed in September to Iraq. Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right for this country, that our leaders – our national leaders – are sending them out on a task that is from God. That’s what he have to make sure we are praying for: that there is a plan and that it is God’s plan.”

    I assume you’re unfamiliar with what it means for a Christian to seek God’s will, but it means constantly being aware of the fact that your plans aren’t necessarily what God wants, and praying that you’re doing the right thing. It’s a little more than “hope”, but a lot less than a declaration of righteousness.

    And I’m not parroting her response (notice that I didn’t reference Lincoln, or allude to ‘God’s side’ or ‘our side’), that was my own analysis. Beyond that, I disagree with a Christian who “would never presume to know God’s will…” That means you’re just not trying.

    I wonder what the response would be if Obama used the same construction, but talked about withdrawal.

    I know that Obama won’t end oil usage right away. But as our oil consumption grows – and it will – not drilling means even more money goes overseas.

    I don’t begrudge McCain’s energy votes because we agree: He’s against subsidies, and so am I. He claims to have voted against it last time because of big oil subsidies that were included. I’m in favor of rewarding achievement, rather than subsidizing the whole project. That’s part of McCain’s plan.

    As for having oil company string-pullers, if it’s true, they aren’t doing a very good job.

    McCain may have 80 former lobbyists on his campaign, but why should it matter so much what they used to do? Are you prepared to call out Obama for being so closely tied to Jim Johnson, who made millions at Fannie Mae through fraud? What about the fact that he won his state senate seat by getting everyone else thrown off the ballot?

    According to OpenSecrets, Dems have taken more than 3 times as much as Republicans in bundled contributions from lobbyists.

    Taxes: There’s no stretching of credulity in what I said about Obama. As for Republicans not holding businesses to the same standard, in 06-07 Exxon paid $68 billion in taxes on $148 billion in income (46%), which is about the same as the bottom 50% of taxpayers paid, on around $2 trillion in income (~3.4%). Companies are paying a decent share.

    And it’s misleading to imply that individuals are stuck with they’re taxes while companies get out of them. I’m in the 15% bracket, and last year I got a $4000 check. The same will happen next time as it does for quite a few people.

    I’m glad you’re comfortable as a liberal Democrat. I hope saying it made you smile. My point with the voting records was that McCain is less beholden to his party than Obama.

    I don’t equate liberal opinions with not being a free thinker. I know free thinking liberals. You usually fall into that category, which is why I’ve respected your opinion so much. But I’m conservative, so you’re right, I wouldn’t ever come around to someone so liberal.

    The “regardless of little things called facts” line doesn’t fit. Facts don’t always point towards liberalism.

    I’m still interested in what you have to say in response to my comments on Clinton, tax & spend, job security, ethics reform, Obama’s broken pledge to take public money, and the other points I made.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Charles I would disagree with any candidate that brings God into politics and acts though he approves of their doings…no matter what side he/she is on. I grew up in a sect of Christianity that stays politically neutral…they do not vote and feel as they they must push their interpretation of God’s will on other people. God gave us free will and I dislike politcal candidates that try to use God as leverage for taking free will away or motivating us into a holy war. So I think you can see a fundamental problem I have with the GOP who like to act as though they are the God party. I would love it if Obama were not Christian…I hate having religion shoved down my throat by either side but I think we both know what side typically does that. But it sounds like we just have to agree to disagree on that because I don’t presume to know what God would do in politics…I never want to do that. If there is a God…I am not so sure anymore…you are speaking to someone who was mightily abused at the hands of God’s people.

    “I know that Obama won’t end oil usage right away. But as our oil consumption grows – and it will – not drilling means even more money goes overseas.”

    You assume though that if we drill the oil will go to us. Why? Oil is a global commodity. Are we SURE every last drop will go to us or will it be auctioned off to the highest bidder? Will it stay here if China decides to “collect” on their debt with cheap oil? Drilling locally might solve nothing and I am not sure of the accuracy but Obama has stated that drilling here will only provide 3% of the oil we use. McCain did not refute that and that is frankly a drop in the bucket…sounds like alternative energy needs to happen alot faster than McCain would have it…if true energy independence is indeed the goal. We should keep using oil until we can phase it out as much as we can but progess towards an alternative has been working at a snail’s pace.

    As for the lobbyist issue….80 lobbyists is a far cry from the one or two you cited Obama is affiliated with. That is a weak comparison. It matters to me because we saw how it worked out when Bush appointed oil men to be in charge of environmental protection. Can we expect the same with McCain…I would guess yes.

    Clinton was balanced in his budget ideas and spending. I don’t think he was hard core left or right in that area but definately more on the liberal side. I think we need to take a more liberal tack then when he was Prez because of the situation we are in now. When he was in office healthcare wasn’t in the state it is now. You heard little about global warming, etc.

    Job security – tough to talk about because I think the issue is only an issue because of the Republican government we have had for so long (minus Clinton’s stint) The whole economic idea that busnesses come before people and then businesses will then take care of the people is fundamentally flawed. Time has shown this to be true. Businesses are out to make money and not take care of their workers so I I find it hard to say that we should continue to reward them for that with tax breaks. We are in a catch 22 here…we really are. I don’t see easy answers on that one either way honestly. Is the answer to crack down on them and impose reform and expect that jobs will be lost or is it best to let them go unregulated, with tax breaks and hope they don’t screw the people too badly? I don’t like either option.

    Ehtics reform…sounds nice in theory but I have doubts that either candidate will do anything about that.

    I am not sure what pledge you are talking about in regards to Obama.

  • http://pos51.org Charles J.

    I have to say again that no one claimed we are in a holy war. What she was saying was something more than a hope, but far less than a declaration that God approves.

    I never said that the oil would go to us. But if we drill it, we sell it. If the oil goes elsewhere – which is unlikely, considering the amount we consume – the money will stay here. What if China want’s to use oil to collect (I’m not sure why you put it in quotes)? I expect we’ll have to pay them somehow, someday regardless. If we give them every drop we drill, we can satisfy our debt without using our currently existing resources, and we’ll lower world demand on the open market, which will lower prices.

    Progress toward alternative energy has been moving slow, since it started more than 100 years ago. We already knew about biodiesel and cellulosic ethanol. We need to get moving. Both candidates promise to see that we do.

    You’re right, 80 former lobbyists is a lot. I’ll give you that. But one criminal on a campaign staff is a lot, too. Particularly when that criminal took $14 million off the books at FNMA.

    I give Clinton credit for balancing the budget. But does his Republican congress deserve none? I also agree that health care is a huge issue. But is the single payer system really the best way to go? Canadians are coming here for treatment, instead of waiting for free care there. The world’s best doctors come to the US to practice, instead of staying home. There has to be something good about our system.

    Unemployment was low during the Clinton era, but I don’t think we can attribute it 100% to liberal or Democratic policies. Just the same, both sides hold some blame in the present situation. Republicans for the ridiculous credit/bankruptcy “regulation” bill they passed a few years ago (with a vote from Joe Biden), and Democrats for refusing to fix Fannie and Freddie 2 years ago when they were presented with the likelihood that something like this would happen.

    Republicans are right that the gov’t shouldn’t be involved in the market, and Democrats are right that executives from failed companies shouldn’t get bonuses or severance.

    Businesses are out to make money, and not to care for their workers. That’s true, and it’s the way it should be. What you’ll find, as companies like FedEx, Microsoft, and Google have found, is that if you want to make money long term, you have to take care of your employees. That’s the only way to keep good, motivated, happy people working for you.

    I think businesses should receive tax breaks for providing benefits to their employees, but not be penalized for choosing not to. Insurance is not something we’re entitled to, it’s not a right; it’s something that has to be paid for. I’m grateful that my employer provides it, but I don’t think he should be forced to.

    Regulation has it’s benefits, but too much can slowly strangle an economy. Look at the E.U. By purchasing power, their economy is equivalent to ours. But they have a workforce that’s almost 50% larger (221M to 155M), and a population that is more than 60% larger (499M to 305M). Add to that the fact that their poverty rate is 4.6% higher, and you might be able to see what I’m saying. Less regulation here is part of the difference.

    We do need protections though, like FMLA and to some extent the minimum wage act, and other things. But they shouldn’t hinder the market.

    I mostly agree with you about ethics reform.

    The pledge I’m talking about is when Obama pledged to use public money for the general election. McCain took the same pledge, and only one of them followed through.

  • http://pos51.org Charles J.

    I wanted to separate this comment because it’s more important than the others.

    It’s a horrible thing when people who call themselves Christians act in abusive ways. I understand the bitterness that comes with being exposed to that…I have a little of it myself. I’m sure though that what I’ve experienced is minor compared to what some people are put through.

    Some people think that calling themselves Christians means that they actually are. And they think that means that God endorses whatever foolish or black-hearted thing they feel like doing.

    I hope that you meet some believers who can be to you what Christ tells us all to be to our neighbors.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Oy Charles you are wearing me out! My brain can’t handle it today, LOL.

    I think most of this boils down to differences of opinion on a fundamental level…no sense arguing details. I will always side with 100% religious neutrality in government and schools to put everyone on the same field. Religion can and should be taught at home and issues like is gay marriage moral shouldn’t even be asked by our government IMO.

    I believe in social justice and do not feel that big business can do whatever they want and take advantage of their workers. I believe that everyone does deserve to have healthcare and not because it is a right but because businesses and corporation have slowly poisoned us with toxic food, products, pharma drugs, vaccines, etc. They have normalized bad health and government let corporations do this to us unregulated…now I feel they owe us healthcare accompanied by regulation of toxics and true education about these issues. The dollar was put before the “rights” of the health of the people and now they need to make up for it. AND Obama’s plan is optional.

    In light of what these businesses do and will do if they are given free reign I cannot support a free market.

    I don’t know enough about Obama’s pledge to make a comment on it. But we certainly can’t trust a man who was a member of the Keating Five like McCain. Many people lost everything to that crook and as far as I can see we have one criminal in jail and one of the others is running for President.

  • http://potluckexposition.wordpress.com Donnie

    I’m curious as to how Obama plans to lower taxes for 95% of the people when 40% of the people pay virtually no taxes in the first place due to the fact that they don’t make a taxable income or they are getting tax credits or exemptions for various reasons. They get virtually everything back in the form of a refund at tax time. If those in the 40% bracket are going to be getting money from Obama, let’s not play games by calling it a tax cut. I think “welfare” fits the bill a little better.

    Our whole tax system needs to be overhauled, and we need to have a fair system where everybody is paying an equal percentage of what they make … or we should just do away with the income tax altogether and just go to a consumption tax.

    Everybody should pay something. Though I’m sure this opinion won’t be favorable with the 40%.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Well, I would like to think it is 95% of the tax paying citizens…not 95% across the board but people walking away with more money than they paid in is not a new concept. I have worked in the tax industry. I favor a consumption tax too…more reliable than an income tax.

  • http://pos51.org Charles J.

    Hey! We agree on taxes. Who knew?

    Anyway, you’re right that we have fundamental disagreements. I wasn’t trying to convert you, just trying to get you to be fair. and you have been.

    I’m for 100% religious neutrality in schools. But my problem with the evolution conversation is that it’s taught as pure, uncontested fact. It’s not. If you want to talk microevolution, that’s proven.

    When it comes to origins, you have 2 choices: all matter and life from nothing, or all matter and life from an intelligence. I think both should be considered faith-based. I don’t think ID should be taught in the curriculum, but a teacher should be allowed to do a unit if he or she pleases. No one would object to a teaching something as ridiculous as multiverse theory, why should ID be different?

    I agree with you that the government shouldn’t wrestle with questions like the morality of gay marriage. They should allow partners to have rights like sharing benefits and hospital visitation, as many cities and states do. But they also shouldn’t be classing sermons in opposition to homosexuality as hate speech.

    I don’t think businesses should be able to take advantage of employees either. Social justice has nothing to do with it.

    I don’t think companies are responsible for our bad decisions. McDonald’s created and sold a product that I liked. It’s not their fault I chose to eat it every day. I think that’s my main problem with liberal politics (other than the hypocritical disdain for people who make money). Everything is someone else’s fault.

    Some companies have done bad things. Let’s punish them, and not all. Target is definitely not responsible for my health problems as a result of eating McDonald’s.

    Besides, I’ve worked a lot of places, and I’ve only had one job where insurance wasn’t available and affordable.

    Pure free market doesn’t work, but regulation can reach a point where it ruins productivity, which hurts more than it helps.

    You should read up on Obama’s pledge. It, along with all his other policy switches since June make me wonder if we can trust anything he promises to do. Of course, I’m against most of those promises anyway, so it might be a good thing.

    I didn’t know anything about the Keating Five (I was 7 at the time), but McCain seems to come out smelling rosy. He resisted involvement, then severed ties when he found out about the criminal investigation. And he was cleared of all charges. Looks okay to me. It can’t be any worse than Obama’s relationship with Rezko. And since he hasn’t had a scandal in the last 20 years, I think he learned his lesson.

    Why does the sting of accusation hold to McCain, but not to Obama?

    And if social justice is important, you should consider that from 2000-2004 Obama gave an average of $2154 in charitable donations, which is less than I give, on about 13% of his average earnings in the time frame. That’s less than 1% of his income. McCain, gave away almost $500K in the last two years. Joe Biden has never given away more than $1000.

    Tiffany, I respect you for being a proud liberal, and since you are, you should definitely vote for Obama. I’m a conservative and respect McCain, so that’s where my vote is going. It’s been fun.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Good debate Charles it has been fun.

    About the compnaies making us ill argument I made I wasn’t talking so much about obvious things like McDonalds. I was talking more about companies that put chemicals and other unnnatura studd in our food and porducts and aren’t required by government to disclose.

    Like companies irradiating our veggies for example or companies putting BPA in baby bottles that leach into the drink. They don’t have to own up to these practices and yet I feel both are hazardous to us and make us unhealthy…hormones in our milk, pesticides on our food, antibiotics in our beef…I could go on and on. It is the stealthy stuff that they do that bothers me. Most consumers are not even aware of these issues and they work hard to keep it that way.

  • http://www.dailydollardiary.com Elizabeth

    I’m still reading through all of the comments but I wanted to chime in.

    I’m a Christian, pro-life, homeschooling, “big oil” Obama Mama!

    Anyone out there still trying to make a decision or educating themselves on the candidates should definitely read “The Audacity of Hope.” It was a life-changing event for me.

    Obama shares my views on abortion: the act itself is repugnant but the possibility of taking away a woman’s right to her own body even more so. Obama certainly does not support late-term abortion. And he has stated very clearly that the best solution is to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies. Can’t we all agree that that would be ideal?

    Obama has found a way to come to terms with his deep relationship to Christianity while remaining a Progressive. I admire that and take great comfort in feeling a little less alone in my efforts to strike the same balance.

    Obama does not support gay “marriage” though he would fight hard to ensure that any and all committed couples, including homosexual couples, have equal legal rights — the right to hospital visitations, legal contracts, insurance benefits, death benefits, etc. He does NOT support legalized gay marriage (though I, myself, do).

    Obama actually has a very open mind about education and the pursuit of innovative and alternative educational methods — including homeschooling. Right now he has to toe the line because the NEA is the most powerful union in this country but his book clearly states that he is open to whatever it takes to improving our educational system.

    My husband is in “oil & gas.” A vote for Obama will almost certainly be against our family’s immediate best interests. But I cannot in good conscience vote any other way because I know that Obama’s policies will be better, in the long run, for our country and my children.

    I do not agree with all of Senator Obama’s policies and ideas. But it is clear that he is a man of deep intuitive wisdom, capable of understanding the complexities of 21st century domestic and global issues we face. He understands that NOTHING is black and white and he is better suited and more prepared to understand and deal with the 1000′s shades of gray than any other politician in our generation.

  • Trisha

    There is no way Obama can offer a tax break to 95% of Americans. 43% of American households DO NOT PAY TAXES, so this is not even possible. And when did Obama vote against the war? He was not a senator when that vote went through the Senate. He has socialist views and ideas. If you want the government to control you and your money, then Obama is your man. If you like your freedom and want to continue to make your own decisions for your family then McCain is your guy.

    On healthcare, yes it would be great for everyone to have healthcare, but Obama’s plan just will not work. It costs money and where will that come from? The 57% of us Americans that DO pay taxes. Look at Canada, they have healthcare for all, yet there is a waiting list to see the doctor! Is that what you REALLY want?

    Obama has 3 former Fannie Mae CEO’s as advisors to his campaign. McCain has pointed to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for the last several years saying their numbers do not add up.

    And as for the war, sometimes war is a necessary evil. I hate war, but when diplomacy does not work (which it never does with terrorists), then further action must be taken. Even in the Bible there was war.

    This is a very important election and I hope people will consider ALL views before voting, not just 1. Both candidates will offer change, but for me, I am not ready to be a socialist country, so I will NOT be voting for Obama.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Trisha,

    Obama is not a socialist nor does he want a socialist society. Republicans might as well have the motto…all for one and more for me…no thanks. Obama’s healthcare plan makes a heckavu lot more sense than McCain’s which is to tax our healthcare benefits for the first time in history (sucking in trillions) and then turn around and offer us $5000 credits towards a $12,000 average healthcare bill. That is nuts IMO. If we have to pay taxes on our healthcare than I would rather actually get healthcare…not a credit I can’t use.

    And who cares if McCain sounded a warning about Fannie and Freddie when for 20+ years he fought for de-regulation of such companies giving them almost limitless power. He helped create that monster and now wants credit for warning us about his own handiwork years after the fact.

    As for war in the Bible….BIG difference. God commanded or instigated those wars directly if the Bible is to believed. We went to Iraq over oil and politics…not because they attacked us or even because we were in danger. We had no business going to war….period. And that war could have paid for health insurance for every man, woman, and child in this country.

    I do consider ALL views and it will be a cold day in hell before I vote for McCain.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Oh and one other thing. McCain’s healthcare plan while being completely stupid also fails to address a BIG problem that many face in this regard…they are uninsurable. Aka they cannot buy decent healthcare coverage even if they wanted to because they are or have been in the past chronically ill. Take me for instance…if I had to buy personal coverage I would not be able to find any that would not cost two arms and legs because I have had cancer. Obama’s plan would give me options when I otherwise have none…or do I deserve to have no healthcare????

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Why any woman or Christian would be out of their cotton picken mind IMO to vote McCain/Palin. She is beyond disgusting. Now she tells us that we will go to hell if we don’t vote for her:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S03ZfFf_gGQ

  • http://mostlynaturalmomma.com Momma

    hey Tiffany — I have to say that I watched the video and did not have the same reaction you did. She did not say that we “will go to hell if we don’t vote for her”. She read us a line off a starbucks cup. And clearly did it just to find out what would happen the next day. She even said that. You are obviously letting your own bias shine through instead of being objective. You need to see if for what is was. A joke. Not even a good joke, but a joke nonetheless. If she was being serious, then we may have something to worry about. But she obviously wasn’t.

  • Michelle

    You are right Momma. And thank you for the nice comment in defense of me to Cate’s response of my post. I did appreciate that. I absolutely understand social justice! I am not even going to respond to the rest of her post.

    Tiffany, Momma is right. She did not mean we are going to hell if we don’t vote for her. Please do not say that any woman or Christian would be out of their mind to vote for her. I personally think the same thing about anyone who votes for Obama. I do not like to say that because it really is not fair to people who have a different opinion than mine, but the more I read posts from Obama supporters I do not feel that they take into consideration other people’s views.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Momma & Michelle,

    It was a quote on a Starbucks cup …except the word was HELP women…not support. Ya know like help other women who are being battered at home and such. The woman who said that even stated it was not a political comment. Palin changed it to support and used it in refernce to voting a woman (herself) into office. So how exactly was she not insinuating that women won’t go to hell if they don’t vote for here. Even if it was a joke…which I don’t believe it was…how is going to hell funny????

    Call me crazy but I don’t think it was funny in the least and shows a lack of class and incredibly bad taste. If Michelle Obama had said it I would equally disgusted…there is no call for that kind of garbage.

  • Michelle

    It really surprises me what people can get stuck on when there are so many more important issues in this election. It was only a quote on a Starbucks cup. Michelle Obama has said disturbing things which are much more serious than reading from a Starbucks cup but I have not heard a disagreement about those comments.

    I also wonder your opinion on how the democrats are getting votes for Obama in your home state of Ohio. I guess Obama doesn’t think he can win fairly?

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Well, honestly what Michelle said about America was not bad at all IMO. As someone that has suffered racial prejudice many us could never dream of I can’t chide her for not being particularly proud of America…but she later clarified what she meant. You can’t mince meanings with what Palin said. She insinuated that women should vote for her or possibly go to hell and she got the quote wrong. She took a slightly bizarre statement to begin with I admit, but made in a good context and turned twisted it to something gross for her own advantage.

    As for Ohio…I don’t support what happened but are you really going to go there? Really??? The GOP stole the election from Al Gore…he WAS the president elect and had he challenged Bush would have been President. They also rigged voting machines in 2004 so that Kerry ended up getting negative votes (in Florida and Ohio)…this has been proven and documented and it is likely Kerry won that election too and it was stolen by the GOP. Being from Ohio I can attest to how many supported Kerry…he was robbed.

    And for this election year the GOP is putting that lone politician in Ohio to shame. Cases in point:

    Republicans sent out absentee applications to registered Democrats in SEVERAL states including Wisconsin with WRONG return addresses so that those voters will have their vote nullified or not counted….this only went to Democrats by the way and if it was an honest mistake…why did it happen 5-6 different times and why were they even sending anything to Democrats???

    http://news.racinepost.com/2008/09/gop-absentee-ballot-mailings-called.html

    And caught again in Florida. This is how Republicans steal elections. Now mispellings or mismatches can get your vote thrown out…even if the government is the one who mispelled your name or otherwise got in wrong in their database…but coincidentally only 10% of these glitches affect Republicans.

    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/state/orl-novote0108oct01,0,6794080.story

    And again….if you lost your house in the mortgage fiasco…the GOP says you can’t vote!!! The chairman of the Republican Party in Macomb County Michigan, a key swing county in a key swing state, is trying to use a list of foreclosed homes to block people from voting in the upcoming election as part of the state GOP’s effort to challenge some voters on Election Day. The voters affected are largely poor democrats and African Americans.

    http://michiganmessenger.com/4076/lose-your-house-lose-your-vote

    And AGAIN… the GOP tries to block people form voting early by not allowing them to vote at their local county clerks office and insisting that they drive over an hour to vote elsewhere if they want to vote early. And this is important because Dems are trying to avoid the cheating the GOP did in 2000 and 2004 by having early voting which the GOP is VERY opposed to.

    http://progressillinois.com/2008/10/04/lake-county-voter-supression

    So who is cheating here?????????????????

  • http://mostlynaturalmomma.com Momma

    Where to begin? lol. I still stand by my original thoughts on Palin’s starbucks cup. She was obviously not serious about people going to hell if they don’t vote for her. She is very much for women’s rights and women supporting other women. And if Hilary or Michelle Obama had said it there would not be the outrage there is about Palin saying it.

    And about AL Gore. If he really thought he won the White House he would have forced the issue. Anybody running that thought they really won would have forced the issue, not just Gore.

    The article called “ID Match Law Stalls 5000 voter applications” in Orlando: Their driver’s license and social security number has to match government databases. And more democrats than republicans are being held up. It is a liberal biased article saying this is being done to democrats on purpose. I am totally ok with saying that your social security number needs to match up with the government. We need to make sure that nobody is voting illegally. People need to realize that you can’t wait until the last minute to realize that you are not eligible to vote. There are deadlines for a reason. If everyone waited until the last minute the people processing the applications would be going crazy!

    The title “lose your house lose your vote” in the Michigan Messenger is a little misleading. You have to be registered at the address where you live to vote. There is nothing wrong saying you need to formally change your address. I had to do it just a few weeks ago because I realized that I hadn’t done it the last time we moved. I just got my application in under the deadline. If I hadn’t changed my address and couldn’t vote, it would have been MY fault. Not the governments.

    With the article out of Illinois, I agree that people should have easy access to voting and if a satellite center will do that then great. But did you miss the part about the democrat’s agreement to no satellite voting in the general election? I think that the democrats need to stand by it. This vote wouldn’t have taken place at all if the democrats has stood by what they first said.

    I think that most of the articles you post have a very liberal bias and therefore do not give an accurate description on what is really happening. People need to get the story from both sides, not just one.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    I forgot one:

    The GOP has been targeting college students and telling them if they register to vote at addresses that are not their parents (which will usually be out of state) they will lose their funding. This is a total lie and they have done this in several sates including Colorado and New Mexico:

    http://www.truthout.org/092508J

    http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/09/09/virginia-county-issues-chilling-voter-registration-report/

    They know the younger voters will vote liberal.

    Okay on to your points…about Gore. Why is it do you think that so many Dems HATE Al Gore??? Because he wouldn’t contest the election. Bush and the GOPers were saying he would throw the country into turmoil and cause harm so he caved and didn’t contest.. Look it up on Wikipedia…Gore had 543,816 more votes than Bush in Florida…the deciding state after a recount was done much later. Gore won.

    I suggest you watch Stealing America: Vote by Vote. It highlights how they proved voter fraud. Gore got 16,022 negative votes counted on a Diebold tabulator in Volusia County, Fla., in 2000. How is it possible to get negative votes? It isn’t…unless someone rigged the machine.

    Did you see this Simpsons clip?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aBaX9GPSaQ

    It is hilarious and clearly shows what public opinion is of the GOP and voter fraud. They have been caught twice now doing this.

    I think you are not seeing in the ID Match Law Stalls 5000 voter applications article that it could be a mispelled name or even the use of maiden name on one form of identification and not another, etc. It could also be the government’s mistake. Why are only 10% of those affected Republicans? How do you explain that?

    In Michigan you don’t seem to realize that forclusures take MONTHS. Those people may very well still be living in those houses, they may have worked out a temporary deal with their mortgage, they may be contesting in court…there are numerous reasons why a bank forclosure list should NOT be used to determine residency. I know a man in Ohio who lived in his forclosed house for over a year after it was forclosed upon. Should they get to vote or not? I say yes.

    And the GOP did not choose to do this in all counties…only a couple counties filled with registered Dems and African Americans. Why didn’t they choose counties with high Republican bases or a high number of whites?? I think we know why.

    I don’t think either party should be trying to block voters but the GOP has Dems beat hands down on that dirty practice and has for YEARS and I find it rather ironic that they call themselves the God Party when they cheat so much.

  • http://mostlynaturalmomma.com Momma

    thanks for the response. I just have no strength to go on. lol. I’m sure you understand. But I did want to share with you a more calm opinion of the Palin starbucks comment.

    http://mommylife.net/archives/2008/10/palin_madeleine.html

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Thx momma for sharing the other side. I admit I am not tolerant of people using religion to impose their views on other people….even in jest. I lived that life for too long, LOL.

  • http://thewanderingteacher-patricia.blogspot.com/ Patricia

    Whoever we vote for it is important to know their real political views are. Not just what they want to reveal because they want to be voted in. This is revealing. What is Obama hiding? Do we really want a president who hides his real views?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCz6dPpP9v8

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Patricia,

    That video propoganda. We have no reason to think he is hiding anything. The GOP of course wants to feed into fear because he has a funny sounding name and perhaps they don’t like a few of his past associates. McCain has just as many radical and or criminal associates tit for tat. McCain has over the years shown he has a strong trend toward racism. That is the last thing we need in the White House and that scares me more than Obama’s funny name.

  • Michelle

    Tiffany,
    Unfortunately, this video is not just propaganda. This serious and I think if you do decide to vote for Obama you need to know who you are getting. You can’t just keep saying these things are lies. Also, only Barack is saying he has a funny name and he is black. The republicans are not. Please let me know the criminal associations that McCain has…if it is from the Keating 5 he has been cleared of that.

    After reading your blog, which I really enjoy I must add, I am surprised that you would be going for someone who is big government.

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Michelle,

    Nothing on that video concerns me. Absolutely nothing….I think it is pure scare tactic for people to be highlighting these things. BOTH candidates are big government….I think McCain is more so. And as for bad associates of McCain….wow…take your pick…there are MANY. If you want that information I am sure you can find it very easily. And he has 89 big government lobbyists in his campaign. Who do think he will take care of after election….us or them?

    Just look at the latest GOP trick discovered over the weekend, GOP volunteers were being told to tell people that Obama is just like Osama Bin Laden. They are actually telling people Obama is like the guy who killed 3000 Americans in a bombing????

  • Michelle

    Tiffany,
    I am like Momma when she says she doesn’t have the strength to go on. I feel the same way but I also am VERY worried about the way our country will be in 4 years if Obama is elected. It does look as of now that he will be our new president.

    I have not heard what the GOP has done this last weekend, but I personally don’t think that the GOP are that far off when they compare Barack to Osama Bin Laden. In my opinion (and yes I’m sure you will vehemently disagree) he has surrounded himself with people who were happy about 9/11. Ayers, Farakhan, Rev. Wright and others are all people who have influenced him. I’m sure you are familiar with the saying you will become like the people you hang out with. For however unhappy people are about the state of the U.S. and Bush’s presidency I really don’t think the answer is to vote for Obama just because he is different than the Republican party.

    One more quick thing on big government…with the hand of the government in everything as it seems like it is going to be, do you think that regarding healthcare that we will now be required to have our children vaccinated or have other things told to us that we need/don’t need to have done? This may be a stretch but I really do believe that we are going down a very scary road when we let the government take over our healthcare. I personally do not get my children vaccinated and have a fear that I will not have that luxery to make that decision myself anymore(among many other fears). I know people think that it is only health insurance that they are getting involved in but I really believe they are going to go much farther than that, imo.
    I think I am done now. :)

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    But Obama does not want universal healthcare to be mandated he wants a governemnt OPTION….it is 100% optional for people. Also most other developed countries do have government healthcare and they seem to be pretty darn happy with it. In Canada they don’t require vaccines but yet they have universal healthcare. You bring up a good point but it is a big MAYBE.

    I like this link about Ayers: http://momocrats.typepad.com/momocrats/2008/10/opponents-assoc.html#more

    It shows how the people that know him…really like him…Republicans and Democrats. And no I don’t think you will turn out just like the people you hang with. Most of my extended family were racists…they hated black people….but yet I grew up and dated one and could have married him. Their bad attitude did not effect me in the least…people know right from wrong. With kids the lines can get blurred but adults know better.

    I don’t think Obama wants to blow our country up, I really don’t….however McCain hanging out with 9 lobbyists shows me he is loyal to corporate American not me and not you…that worries me far more than Obama. being an associate of a mild mannered school teach.

    This is exhausting though isn’t it….I think I am skipping the debate tomorrow cause I am just getting tired of it. LOL.

  • Cate

    I am actually surprised that people take this type of “news report” seriously. As the mother of a biracial child, I find is offensive, and frankly: racist. Here, we’ll link Obama with people with funny names, and white America will be scared. Can you say Rush Limbaugh?
    http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/rush-limbaugh-says-blacks-are-angry-and

    “Black America” does not hate our country. Fox, as usual, is finding incediary clips of people who have nothing to do with Obama. But they have foreign names, so be afraid!

    Use the words “radical” or “terrorist”, and then it becomes an US versus THEM issue. News no longer has to report on policies or present anything resembling a reasonable debate: they simply have to make a man seem foreign enough, and hopefully enough Americans will buy the laughable claim that he is a traitor who hates America.
    Another thing that this thread of argument reminds me of is this e-mail circulating the Web, which I’m sure some of you have received. It goes through all the “Muslim terrorist activity” over the last 30 years (and the subject is “Historical Events”) and then links Obama to it, claiming he was raised a Muslim too and is lying about. (Muslim equals terrorist…seriously?!) He wasn’t. His father had no part in his life. He was raised by a white single mom, much like my son was in his early years.
    Wow, guys…you certainly give me hope on what my son can become! I mean, he is biracial, intelligent, and has a “funny” name. Well, at least I can hope that he doesn’t meet anyone in college from another country, so the illustrious Fox News won’t have any fodder!

  • http://pos51.org Charles

    Cate,

    I listened to the Rush clip, and I have to say that I don’t think he’s that far off. As a child I was “influenced” to dislike America (and “America” was usually synonymous with “white people”). My mom made sure I knew in 3rd grade that I didn’t have to put my hand over my heart during the national anthem or say the pledge of allegiance. Telling a nine-year-old something like that is the same as telling them not to do it.

    My parents weren’t and aren’t the militant sort. They were early black yuppies, graduating college before the civil rights movement. They were people who wanted all the trappings of the middle class, without actually wanting to be such (because it was also synonymous with “white people”.) I grew up in white neighborhoods in Pittsburgh and Dallas, and in both places my parents would talk occasionally with our neighbors, but drive 30 or 40 minutes to hang out with a black family.

    Rush may have stumbled into hyperbole when he said “hate, hate, hate…”, but many, if not most of us, were raised to have a strong distaste for whites and the country.

    As the father of a biracial child, I worry a bit about what other kids will be like with him, but I don’t need “hope on what [he] can become.” This is America, he can become anything – or nothing.

    Stop using chain emails as targets…not even conservatives buy them. Though I have passed one or two to liberal friends to annoy them… And by the same token, the only people tossing this “funny name” business around are Obama and people who repeat his sound bites. Sure the Sacramento Republican Party did something stupid and repulsive (and not even a little bit funny), but they got pressure from every other person in the party.

    Tiffany,

    Using Obama’s health care may be optional, but paying for it won’t be. Also, will doctors be required to accept the state insurance? If not, the good ones will opt out, because the billing limits will be ridiculously low, and the hassle, as with all government programs, will be large. The patients will be stuck with lesser qualified practitioners who need the work, and a few who have a heart for the needy (I’m not an optimist when it comes to the number of doctors who really care – please don’t try to convince me with an anecdote). I guess any doctor is better than no doctor, though.

    The real question is where does the money come from? Sen. Obama has yet to say what programs he would cut or scale back, except to say “we can’t do everything right away.”

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    We already pay for other people’s healthcare….Medicaid, Medicare, skyrocketing prices for healthcare and insurance because of so many uninsured, ect. This way we at least have the option to get something out of it. Most doctors now don’t opt out of state health programs…I know doctors who have built their entire practice around exactly those patients as I use do work in healthcare and managed care marketing.

    Obama hasn’t said what he will cut but I am not surprised. Imagine if he planned to cut fluff payments going to a specific industry and they heard about it before hand….they would go to bat for his opponent. It makes sense to keep that close to the vest IMO.

  • http://pos51.org Charles

    We already pay for some people’s healthcare. Kids and old folks, people who aren’t capable of caring for themselves are quite a bit different from this. This has the potential to be everyone’s healthcare.

    Plenty of doctors opt out of those programs. My son was on Medicaid until recently, and the doctor assigned to us (no, we did not get to choose) was awful, we actually paid out of pocket to see another doctor, until we could find a decent one who would take Medicaid and then had to wait for the switch to be approved. I think Obama said you’d be able to keep your doctor, but what if your doctor decides not to accept the insurance? Will the gov’t decide to make it mandatory after a few years?

    I’m not surprised by Obama not saying what he’ll cut either. I am surprised by your take on the logic, though…do you think he’s keeping quiet so as not to ruffle the feathers of those “special interest” groups he’s so against? That doesn’t sound like the Obama you’ve been raving about.

    That Obama would tell those guys why they deserve to lose those payments, and that they should vote for him anyway. I have to admit, I gained some respect for him the other day for saying directly to Joe the Plumber that he plans to raise taxes and that he thinks it’s the right thing to do.

    And don’t the people deserve to know what policies they can expect from the person they vote for? Shouldn’t researchers know before they vote that he might cut funding in their field? Shouldn’t business owners and organizations know if he’s planning to cut some of the support that they receive?

    John McCain went to Iowa, stood next to state officials, and said that he opposes ethanol subsidies. He went to Wisconsin and told them he opposes agricultural subsidies. That may be costing him right now, but those voters know where he stands.

    I’m not always sure where Obama stands. A few weeks ago, he said that something needed to be done about the economic situation, people were losing their houses, and people were (in danger of) losing their jobs. Three things we already knew. He didn’t say what he thought should be done, only that, despite the urgency of his statements, it wasn’t important enough for him to get involved (“Call me if you need me.”) Sure, it was said that he was merely dealing with two issues at once, but how could he deal with an issue that required intense negotiations, without going to the negotiating table? These two still have jobs in the legislature, so when something major comes along, I think it’s better if they show up for work.

    I went off the rails there somewhere, nonetheless, the healthcare plan will deteriorate quickly into the same state as every other assistance program – broken.

  • Michelle

    Hi Tiffany,
    I just have one more quick thing to write before the elections Tues. On the subject of health care…Obama’s views (in doing research) is very much for vaccinations, while McCain is for the right of the parents in being in charge of their child’s health, i.e. choosing whether or not to have their child vaccinated. I know you are against Sarah Palin but I believe she is going to be on our side when it comes to the health and well being of our children.

    Like I said before I am VERY afraid of Obama’s health care. It is going to be government run and when the government runs something (whether he is saying it or not) they can dictate what we do!

    We are so very close to electing our president I just had to make one more comment! :)

  • http://www.naturemoms.com Tiffany

    Thanks Michelle, but as a military man I seriously doubt McCain is against vaccination. The military is VERY pro-vaccination. I think McCain is just saying what people want to hear…aka personal choice. This election has already shown a great amount of dishonesty on his part.

    I applaud Obama’s for being candid…even if it wasn’t what people want to hear. This would not be a big enough issue to sway my vote and can’t in matter of fact because I already voted.